Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
DEEPU NAYER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations against the petitioner involve serious wildlife offenses related to protected species. (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments centered around whether custodial interrogation is necessary. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 3. court discussed discretion needed in bail applications and requirement for substantial evidence. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court granted pre-arrest bail based on the nature of allegations. (Para 9) |
| 5. conditions for bail were established and the implications of potential violation. (Para 10) |
ORDER
This bail application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short ‘ BNSS ’).
2. Petitioner is the second accused in O.R.No.17/2025 of Karikulam Forest Station, Pathanamthitta, registered alleging offences punishable under Sections 2(16), 9, 39(1),(2),(3), 42, 43, 50, 51, 52 and 57 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act , 1972 [for short, ‘the Act’]; alleging illegal possession and trading of two Red Sand Boa, which is included in Schedule No.1 of the above Act.
3. I have heard Sri.P.T.Sheejish, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Smt.Sreeja V., the learned Public Prosecutor.
4. Petitioner is alleged to have supplied Red Sand Boa t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
