IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANU, J
MUHAMMED NISHAL M.P. – Appellant
Versus
THE GRIEVANCE OFFICER NATIONAL CYBER CRIME REPORTING PORTAL - NCCRP, KERALA REGION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 15086 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. representation of parties in court. (Para 1) |
| 2. bank's compliance with police directions. (Para 2) |
| 3. court directives regarding account freezing. (Para 3) |
| 4. order for compliance and future actions. (Para 4 , 5) |
S. MANU, J -------------------------------------------------------------
WP(C) No. 15086 of 2025 -------------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 17th day of September, 2025
JUDGMENT
The learned Government Pleader appeared for the 1st respondent, the learned Central Government Counsel appeared for the 2nd respondent and the learned Standing Counsel appeared for the 3rd respondent. Though notice was issued, there is no appearance for the 4th respondent.
2. The learned Standing Counsel for the 3rd respondent Bank, on instructions, submitted that the impugned action was taken by the Bank on the instructions received from the 4th respondent. However, no particular amount was mentioned in the requisition issued to the Bank.
3. As there is no appearance for the 4th respondent, though notice was issued, I dispose this writ petition with the following directions:-
(i) The Police Authorities concerned are hereby directed to inform the Bank as to whether freezing of the petitioner's account will be required to be continued and if so, for how long. They shall also intimate as to whether freezing/lien can be confined to any particular amount;
(ii) On the Bank receiving the aforesaid information/intimation from the Police Authorities, they shall comply with it and complete necessary action - either continuing the freezing or lien for such period as mentioned therein; or withdrawing it, or by limiting it as the case may be;
(iii) The police officers concerned shall inform the Bank whether the seizure of the amount in the bank account has been reported to the jurisdictional Magistrate and if not, the time limit within which the seizure will be reported. If no intimation as to the compliance or the proposal to comply with Section 106 of the BNSS is received by the Bank within two months of receipt of a copy of this judgment, the Bank shall lift the debit freeze or remove the lien, as the case may be, on the petitioner's bank account;
(iv) In order to enable the Police to comply with the above direction, the Bank, as well as the petitioner, shall forthwith serve a copy of this judgment to the police officer concerned and retain proof of such service.
4. It is clarified that the police authority concerned shall be at liberty to approach this Court to seek review of this judgment if required.
5. The respondent Bank is not precluded from freezing or imposing lien on the petitioner's account on receipt of any subsequent requests/ orders from any law enforcing agencies or courts.
The writ petition is ordered accordingly.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.