Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANU, J
MUHAMMED NISHAL M.P. – Appellant
Versus
THE GRIEVANCE OFFICER NATIONAL CYBER CRIME REPORTING PORTAL - NCCRP, KERALA REGION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. representation of parties in court. (Para 1) |
| 2. bank's compliance with police directions. (Para 2) |
| 3. court directives regarding account freezing. (Para 3) |
| 4. order for compliance and future actions. (Para 4 , 5) |
S. MANU, J -------------------------------------------------------------
WP(C) No. 15086 of 2025 -------------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 17th day of September, 2025
JUDGMENT
The learned Government Pleader appeared for the 1st respondent, the learned Central Government Counsel appeared for the 2nd respondent and the learned Standing Counsel appeared for the 3rd respondent. Though notice was issued, there is no appearance for the 4th respondent.
2. The learned Standing Counsel for the 3rd respondent Bank, on instructions, submitted that the impugned action was taken by the Bank on the instructions received from the 4th respondent. However, no particular amount was mentioned in the requisition issued to the Bank.
3. As there is no appearance for the 4th respondent, though notice was issued, I dispose this writ petition with the following directions:-
(i) The Police Authorities concerned are hereby directed to inform the Bank as to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
