IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
MUHAMMED KHAMARUDHEEN T K., RIYAS. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
O R D E R
This bail application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘ BNS S ’). 2. Petitioners are accused in Crime No.1390 of 2025 of Tirur Police Station, Malappuram, registered for the offences punishable under Section 305 (e) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘ ’), apart from Section 20 r/w Section 23 of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001 (for short, ‘the Sand Act’).
3. According to the prosecution, the accused had on
03.09.2025, transported river sand on tipper lorries bearing registration Nos.KL-07-AY-1537, KL-05-V-0525 and KL-10-X-8208, thereby committing the offence alleged.
4. I have heard Sri. Sadiqali M., the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Smt.Sreeja V., the learned Public Prosecutor.
5. In the decision inMohammed Noufal v. State of Kerala [(2021) SCC Online Ker 5858] , this Court has held that Sections 20 and 23 of the Sand Act are bailable in nature. It was also observed that, when a special law covering the question of theft of river sand has been enacted, the offence under IPC for theft of river sand cannot be attracted. After the coming into
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.