Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N. NAGARESH, J
KRISHNANKUTTY B – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim based on chronic disease eligibility for free medical service. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding government's stance on aid and eligibility conditions. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. court's ruling on the distinction between government-funded and non-government-funded treatment. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT Dated this the 26th day of September, 2025 The petitioner states that he has 40% locomotor disability and he is suffering from a number of chronic diseases. The 3rd respondent found that the petitioner is eligible for getting free medical aid under AAY Scheme.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 5th respondent has rejected the claim of the petitioner stating that the petitioner’s Ration Card record shows that he is a service pensioner and his name is not included in the health insurance scheme named Karunya Arogya Suraksha Padhathi. The petitioner is before this Court aggrieved by Ext.P5 order issued by the Superintendent of Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram.
3. Government Pleader entered appearance and resisted the writ petition. The Government Pleader submitted that the petitioner and similarly situated persons who are suffering from chronic di
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
