IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
NAVEEN CHACKO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for pre-arrest bail under section 438. (Para 2) |
| 2. accusations of dowry harassment against petitioners. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. consideration of bail with emphasized conditions. (Para 6) |
| 4. final ruling granting bail with specific terms. (Para 7) |
ORDER
This is an application seeking pre-arrest bail filed under Section
438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973.
2. Petitioners are accused Nos. 1 to 3 in Crime No.1302 of 2025 of Vaikom Police Station, Kottayam alleging offence under Section 85 r/w.
Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
3. The prosecution case is that the petitioners, who are the husband, father-in-law and mother-in-law respectively of the de facto complainant, harassed her physically and mentally pursuant to their demand for dowry and thus they committed the offence.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that petitioners are absolutely innocent in the matter and that they are falsely implicated in a crime for justifying a matrimonial dispute.
5. I have heard the learned Public Prosecutor also.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations, I am of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.