Back
Next 
2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 44077
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
AJISH M.M – Appellant
Versus
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 23116 OF 2025
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.ALEX K.JOHN, SHRI.SREEKUTTAN M., SHRI.SIJIN STANLEY, SHRI.SATHEESH T.P., SHRI.SURESH P.N., SHRI.ARUN K.V., SMT. JILCY JACOB, SHRI.NINAN THOMAS, SHRI.GEGO GEORGE, SMT.PRATHITHA MARIYAM THOMAS, SHRI.JACOB JOHN
For the Respondents: SHRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR), GP.SMT.JESSY S. SALIM, SC-SRI.K.JANARDHANA SHENOY
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.ALEX K.JOHN, SHRI.SREEKUTTAN M., SHRI.SIJIN STANLEY, SHRI.SATHEESH T.P., SHRI.SURESH P.N., SHRI.ARUN K.V., SMT. JILCY JACOB, SHRI.NINAN THOMAS, SHRI.GEGO GEORGE, SMT.PRATHITHA MARIYAM THOMAS, SHRI.JACOB JOHN
For the Respondents: SHRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR), GP.SMT.JESSY S. SALIM, SC-SRI.K.JANARDHANA SHENOY
Dismissal of a writ petition occurs when the matter is deemed infructuous.
Headnote:Statute Analysis: The petition was filed under WP
(C) regarding local self-government issues. Facts of the Case: The petitioner AJISH M.M argues that the matter is now infructuous due to a lack of action on the part of the respondents.
Findings of Court:
The court acknowledges the petition's infructuous nature and accordingly dismisses it.
Issues: The main issue identified is whether the writ petition should be dismissed on grounds of being infructuous.
Ratio Decidendi: The court inferred that since the matter has become infructuous, it warrants dismissal, stating, 'the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.'
Result: The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.
Recording the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
