Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
ABDUL MAJEED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction details for misappropriation and dowry demands. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides regarding evidence credibility. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's evaluation of evidence and conclusion on convictions. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. summary of court's rationale on conviction adjustments. (Para 11) |
| 5. final rulings and modifications to sentences. (Para 12) |
O R D E R
(Dated this the 25th day of September, 2025)
The challenge in this revision petition is the conviction and sentence rendered against the revision petitioners under Sections 406 and 498A r/w 34 of IPC .
2. The revision petitioners are accused Nos.1 and 2 respectively in CC No. 221/2002 on the files of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court I, Parappanangadi. They, along with another accused stood trial before that court for committing the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 406 r/w
34 of IPC .
3. The prosecution case in brief is as follows;
The 1st accused married PW1 on 14.03.2002.
Thereafter, while living together in the house of the accused, the accused three in number, in furtherance of their common intention, misappropriated Rs.50,000/- and 40 sovereigns of gold ornaments out of the 50 sovereign
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
