SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 69150

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
USHA SABU – Appellant
Versus
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Respondent
MACA 2301/2021



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.

WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH 2025/ 28TH PHALGUNA, 1946 MACA NO. 2301 OF 2021 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 28.04.2021 IN OP(MV)

NO.1284 OF 2018 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, PALA.

APPELLANT/PETITIONERS/CLAIMANTS:

1 USHA SABU AGED 48 YEARS W/O.DECEASED SABU A.V. @ G.V.SABU, ILLAVUNKAL HOUSE, PULIKUNNU BHAGOM, KARINILAM P.O., ERUMELI NORTH VILLAGE, KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, KERALA - 686 513.

2 CHINCHU SABU D/O.DECEASED SABU A.V. @ G.V.SABU, AGED 27 YEARS, ILAVUNKAL HOUSE, PULIKUNNU BHAGOM, KARINILAM P.O., ERUMELI NORTH VILLAGE, KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, KERALA -

686 513.

3 CHINNU SABU AGED 25 YEARS D/O.DECEASED SABU A.V. @ G.V.SABU, ILAVUNKAL HOUSE, PULIKUNNU BHAGOM, KARINILAM P.O., ERUMELI NORTH VILLAGE, KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, KERALA - 686 513.

BY ADVS.

CYRIAC KURIAN SUJITH MATHEW JOSE RESPONDENT/3RD RESPONDENT IN OP(MV):

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

REP. BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, TRIO CHAMBERS KANJIKKUZHI, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686 004.

BY ADV P.JACOB MATHEW THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 19th day of March, 2025 The appeal arises out of the award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Pala, in O.P.(M.V.) No. 1284 of 2018.

2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the appeal are as follows;

3. The legal heirs of one Sabu A.V. approached the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, claiming the compensation on account of the death of Sabu A.V. On 04.09.2018, at 07:15 am, while he was walking through Perumbavoor MC road after parking his lorry and when he crossed to the Perumbavoor Reliance Pump, a Qualis car bearing registration No.KL-05-M-5953 driven in a rash and negligent manner came and hit the deceased. As a result of the accident, Sabu A.V. sustained severe injuries and was taken to San Joe Hospital, Perumbavoor, and later referred to the Medical Trust Hospital, Ernakulam. While undergoing treatment, he succumbed to his injuries on 13.09.2018. 4. The claimants contended that the deceased, Sabu, was a heavy lorry driver and was earning an income of Rs.25,000/- per month. In support of the contention, Exts.A1 to A16 documents were produced and marked. No evidence was adduced from the side of the Insurance Company. The Tribunal, however, on appreciation of evidence, found that the claimants could not adduce any evidence to show that the said Sabu was earning an income of Rs.25,000/- per month. Therefore, the Tribunal fixed the income notionally at Rs.12,000/- and granted the following compensation:

Sl. No. Head of claim Amount claimed (₹.)s symbol is ₹.₹₹ Amount awarded (₹.)s Basic – vital details in nut shell
1 Loss of earnings NA .....
2 Transport to hospital 20000 5000
3 Medical expense 350000 305720
4 Extra nourishment 50000 2500
5 Damage to clothing 5000 1000
6 Pain and Suffering 942000 15000 On a reasonable evaluation
7 Funeral expenses 50000 15000 National Insurance v. Pranay Sethi – (AIR 2017 SC 5157)

8 Loss of consortium to the petitioners. 100000 40000 Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Manu Ram @ Chuhru Ram)
9 Compensation for loss of love and affection 200000 Not allowed .........
10 Compensation for loss of dependency 2208000 712800
11 Loss of estate 25000 15000 National Insurance v. Pranay Sethi - (AIR 2017 SC 5157)
Total Claim limited to 40 lakhs Rs.11,12,020/-

5. Heard Sri.Sujith Mathew Jose, learned Counsel appearing for the appellants, and Sri. P. Jacob Mathew, learned Counsel appearing for the Insurance Company. 6. On a consideration of the rival submissions raised across the Bar, this Court finds that the appellants are entitled to succeed. The notional income fixed by the Tribunal at Rs.12,000/- is liable to be interdicted by this Court, in the light of principle

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top