Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
V. G. Arun, J
MUHAMMED JASEEL P.A – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused faces allegations of fraud and has specific employment needs. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding allegations and necessity for passport release. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observation on balancing ongoing investigation with employment travel needs. (Para 5) |
ORDER
Petitioner is the 1st accused in Crime No.472 of 2022 registered at the Kuthuparamba Police Station alleging commission of the offences punishable under Section 420 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code . According to the prosecution, petitioner and the other three accused were associated with a company named Qnet Ltd., a Hong Kong based multi-level marketing company and by promising to provide employment in the company, accused collected total sum of Rs.61,48,500/- from the defacto complainant and 35 others. After collecting the money, neither the promised employment was given nor the amount refunded. The petitioner was arrested in connection with the crime on 22.03.3024, and on production before the Magistrate, was granted interim bail on the same day. Thereafter, he was granted regular bail as per Annexure-B order dated 25.03.2024, subject to certain conditions. Condition No.2 in Annex
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
