SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 12762

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
N. NAGARESH, J
JANMEJOY KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SHARAN SHAHIER, RAKHY BABY, AGNA JOY, EDWIN JOSE, SRI.M.P. PRASANTH, SRI.DEVAPRASANTH P.J, SMT.SMINI JOSE

O R D E R

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

The accused in CC No.10/2021 of the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kozhikode are in revision aggrieved by the rejection of their application for discharge CMP No.1063/2021 filed under Section 239 Cr.P.C.

2. The prosecution alleged that Bhardhaman Agro Products (I) Private Limited is a corporate firm and its Marketing Promotional Manager is the informant. The Firm is marketing rice in the brand name “Rose Brand”. The accused conspired together and formed a Firm named “Bhardhaman JM Agro Products”. The accused marketed their finished rice products in packets marked as “Three Roses”, which is deceptively similar to the trade mark of the informer. The accused marketed their rice as if it is the product of Bhardhaman Agro Products (I) Private Limited.

3. When the Station House Officer submitted Final Report for offences punishable under Sections 465 , 467, 468, 420 and 120B read with Section 34 IPC and Section 63 of the Copyright Act , the accused filed CMP No.1063/2021 seeking discharge, invoking Section 239 Cr.P.C.

4. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, after examining the petitioner and hearing the parties, held that affixing a brand name deceptively simila

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top