SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 19837

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
N. NAGARESH, J
Mary Elias – Appellant
Versus
1. The Ministry Of Environment Forest & Climate Change – Respondent


Advocates:
Binu Paul, M.P. Sreekrishnan, T.P. Sajan, S.Manu

J U D G M E N T

Dated this the 19th day of December, 2022 The petitioner, who is engaged in quarrying and mining in Kottappady Village in Kothamangalam Taluk of Ernakulam District, has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the condition in addition to the General Conditions mentioned in Clause No.3 of Ext.P1.

2. The petitioner submitted application for grant of quarrying lease to the Director of Mining and Geology. The petitioner states that he was issued with Ext.P1 Environmental Clearance Certificate dated 30.06.2022 of the Director on condition that the petitioner shall obtain Wildlife Clearance Certificate from the National Wildlife Board.

3. The petitioner states that the petitioner's Quarry is situated 9 kilometers away from the Thattekkad Bird Sanctuary. Therefore, the proposed buffer Zone identified and demarcated will not take in the quarrying area of the petitioner. The petitioner pointed out that recently the Hon'ble Apex Court in T.N.Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India [2022 (3) KLT 739 (SC)] has held that the restriction applicable to ESZ is confined to the proposed area only.

4. In view of the judgment of the Apex Court, Ext.P1 Environmental Clearance of SIEAA al

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top