SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 4495

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Kauser Edappagath, J
AMAL JOHNSON – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
JITHIN BABU A, ARUN SAMUEL, CLETUS THOTTAPILLY

O R D E R

Annexure-7 order is under challenge in this Crl.M.C.

2. The petitioner is the accused in SC.No.1104 of 2021 on the files of the Fast Track Special Court, Thrissur (for short 'the court below').

3. The petitioner faces trial for the offences punishable under Sections 15 of POCSO Act and 67A and 67B of the Information Technology Act .

4. The prosecution allegation is that the petitioner has downloaded child Pornographic contents in his mobile phones and viewed it. The Police thereafter seized the mobile phones and crime was registered.

5. The mobile phones containing the alleged pornographic contents were sent for forensic examination and report was obtained. The data extracted from the mobile phones, sim cards and memory cards were copied in a hard disc and produced at the court below. The report shows that in two folders there are pornographic contents.

6. The petitioner filed two petitions at the court below as Crl.M.P.No.581 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.No.586 of 2022. Crl.M.P.No.581 of 2022 has been filed to issue a copy of the hard disc, which forms part of the forensic report, to him or his counsel. Crl.M.P.No.586of 2022 has been filed to grant a minimum time of 18 hours to the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top