SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 31013

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Murali Purushothaman, J
SABEER.C – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the owner in possession of an extent of 1.80 Ares of land comprised in Resurvey Nos.484/60-4 and 484/60-5 of Vallangi Village, Chittur Taluk, Palakkad District.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the 1st respondent, RDO to consider and dispose of Ext.P2 application in Form 5 filed under Rule 4(d) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy land and Wetland Rules, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rules’).

3. Ext.P2 being a statutory application under the Rules, the competent authorities have a bounden duty to consider the same in accordance with law within a reasonable time.

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of directing the Agricultural OfÏcer concerned to submit a report as contemplated under Rule 4(e) of the Rules to the RDO within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The RDO shall dispose of Ext.P2 application, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the report from the Agricultural OfÏcer concerned. The timelines as above shall be strictly complied with by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top