HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Murali Purushothaman, J
SABEER.C – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is the owner in possession of an extent of 1.80 Ares of land comprised in Resurvey Nos.484/60-4 and 484/60-5 of Vallangi Village, Chittur Taluk, Palakkad District.
2. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the 1st respondent, RDO to consider and dispose of Ext.P2 application in Form 5 filed under Rule 4(d) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy land and Wetland Rules, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rules’).
3. Ext.P2 being a statutory application under the Rules, the competent authorities have a bounden duty to consider the same in accordance with law within a reasonable time.
Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of directing the Agricultural OfÏcer concerned to submit a report as contemplated under Rule 4(e) of the Rules to the RDO within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The RDO shall dispose of Ext.P2 application, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the report from the Agricultural OfÏcer concerned. The timelines as above shall be strictly complied with by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.