O R D E R

These Revision Petitions have been filed against the order passed by the Family Court, Thalassery in M.C.No.78/2013 dated 20.04.2015.

2. The status of the parties is shown as in M.C before the Family Court. The 1^st petitioner is the wife and the 2^nd petitioner is the child of the counter petitioner. The petitioners filed the maintenance case against the counter petitioner claiming monthly maintenance at the rate of Rs.15,000/- each per month. The counter petitioner took a contention that the 1^st petitioner left the matrimonial home without any reason and she was living separately and hence, she was not entitled to claim maintenance under Section 125 (4) of Cr.P.C . The Family Court accepted the said contention and declined maintenance to the 1^st petitioner. However, the Family Court granted a monthly maintenance of Rs.5,000/- to the 2^nd respondent. Challenging the order of the Family Court declining the maintenance to the 1^st petitioner, the petitioners preferred RPFC No.2 of 2016. Dissatisfied with the quantum of maintenance awarded to the 2^nd petitioner, the counter petitioner filed RPFC No.174 of 2015.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner in RPFC No.174 of 2015 and