IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Kauser Edappagath, J
MANOJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SHOUKATHALI – Respondent
ORDER :
1. These criminal revision petitions are connected arising out of the common judgment.
2. The 1st respondent in both revision petitions filed two complaints against the petitioner under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short 'the NI Act') before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class-II, North Paravur (for short 'the trial court') as S.T. Nos. 156 and 165 of 2012 alleging offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I Act.
3. The case of the complainant is as follows:- The complainant and the accused were classmates and were working at UAE. The accused borrowed 2,93,225/- UAE Dirhams from the 1st respondent, which is equivalent to Rs.37,67,941/- and towards the discharge of the said liability, Exts.P1 & P12 cheques were issued, which, on presentation, were dishonoured for want of sufficient funds. Even though a statutory notice under Section 138 (b) of NI Act was issued and received by the petitioner, there was no compliance. Hence, the prosecution was launched. Both cases were tried jointly by the trial court. On the side of the complainant, PW1 and PW2 were examined and Exts.P1 to P19 were marked. On the side of the defence, DW1 to DW3 were examined and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.