IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Dr, Kauser Edappagath, J
MUHAMMED HANEEFA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
O R D E R
Since both these revision petitions are connected and the parties are one and the same, they are disposed of by a common judgment.
2. The 2nd respondent preferred Annexure A2 complaint before the District Police Chief, Thrissur against the petitioners alleging that the petitioners approached her and induced her to believe that if she deposits money in the business run by them, she will be given profit every month and the money will be returned as and when demanded and believing the said words, she parted with Rs.22,00,000/- to the petitioners. The petitioners thereafter cheated her without giving the profit as agreed or returning the amount. On the basis of Annexure A2 complaint, the Sub Inspector of Police, East Police Station, Thrissur registered Annexure A1 FIR against the petitioners. After investigation, two final reports were filed before the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thrissur (for short, 'the trial court'). Those final reports were marked as Annexure A3 in both the revision petitions. Based on Annexure A3 final report in Crl.R.P.No. 2927 of 2011, C.C.No.82 of 2010 was registered and based on Annexure A3 final report in Crl.R.P.No.2928 of 2011, C.C.No.83 of 20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.