IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V.CHITAMBARESH, J
ANIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. final order and direction for public redress (Para 1) |
| 2. impact of fireworks on community safety (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 3. call for ban on high-decibel fireworks (Para 5 , 12) |
| 4. details of the explosion incident and legal actions (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. arguments for and against bail applications (Para 13 , 16 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. court's reasoning on bail considerations (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
ORDER
“Enactment of a law, but tolerating its infringement, is worse than not enacting law at all. The continued infringement of law, over a period of time, is made possible by adoption of such means which are best known to the violators of law. Continued tolerance of such violations of law not only renders legal provisions nugatory but such tolerance by the Enforcement Authorities encourages lawlessness and adoption of means which cannot, or ought not to be tolerated in any civilized society. Law should not only be meant for law-abiding but is meant to be obeyed by all for whom it has been enacted. A law is usually enacted because the legislature feels that it is necessary.…………………….” observed the Hon’ble Supreme Court inIndian Council for Enviro-Legal Action vs. Un
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.