SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 37035

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V. G. Arun, J
ABDULLA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.V.SABU
For the Respondents: SRI. M.P. PRASANTH, PP

O R D E R

Dated this the 10th day of June, 2025 The petitioner’s son is the 6th accused in Crime No.493 of 2022 of Manjeswar Police Station registered for offences punishable under Sections 341 , 324, 364, 302 and 120(b) read with Sections

201 and 212 of the Indian Penal Code .

2. After arresting petitioner’s son, a search was conducted in his house and Rs.4,57,000/- was seized. The petitioner’s application seeking release of the cash was allowed subject to conditions. Being aggrieved by the condition requiring him to furnish bank guarantee for equivalent amount, petitioner approached this Court. By Annexure A2 order, this Court rejected the prayer for deletion/ modification of the condition requiring furnishing of bank guarantee.

Thereafter, the petitioner moved yet another Crl.M.C on the premise that subsequent to Annexure A2 order, his son was arrested and released on bail. The said Crl.M.C was also dismissed as per Annexure A3 order. Hence, this Crl.M.C.

3. Although learned Counsel for the petitioner strenuously contended that there should be a re-look at the condition imposed in view of the changed circumstances, including filing of final report, I refrain from doing so, being b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top