Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
AMIT RAWAL, J
VASU COCO RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of subsidy eligibility and discontinuation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. claim and basis for legal proceedings. (Para 6) |
| 3. judgment and directive for disbursement of due amounts. (Para 8) |
| 4. arguments against retroactive application of subsidy withdrawal. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. judicial review of government decision on subsidy. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. promissory estoppel and prospective operation of government orders. (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT
Petitioner company since 2013 is running a five star hotel in Vayalar in Alappuzha District established, as a part of Tourism Promotion and, obtained High Tension electric connection from the Kerala State Electricity Board. The Government of Kerala vide order dated 26-09-2000 G.O.(MS)No. 537/2000/GAD Thiruvananthapuram, declared certain benefits to industrial units like Five Star Hotel as a part of promoting “Tourism” industry one of which was concession in electricity charges. As a result of the aforementioned order dated 26-09-2000 G.O. (MS)No. 537/2000/GAD Thiruvananthapuram produced herein as Ext.P1, the first respondent, State Government undertook to pay the difference between the commercial tariff and industrial tariff as subsidy an
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
