HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P. G. Ajithkumar, J
INDU VIJAYAKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Crl.MC 4217 2023
Criminal - Quashing of FIR - Indian Penal Code - Sections 417, 420 - Court analyzed the petitioner’s argument of absence of offence despite allegations, ruled for completion of investigation within two months.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a Criminal Miscellaneous Case to quash the FIR alleging offences under sections 417 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, contending that the allegations did not constitute any offence and were intended to defame.
Finding of the Court:
The court acknowledged that while the investigation need not be stalled, a delay was prejudicial to the petitioner, hence directed the Investigating Officer to complete the investigation expediently within two months.
Issues: Whether the FIR contained sufficient grounds for criminal charges under sections 417 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, and if the investigation was unduly delayed.
Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the allegations in the FIR did not, if accepted, establish offences under the cited sections and emphasized the need for timely investigations to prevent prejudice.
Final Decision: The court directed timely completion of the investigation within two months.
ORDER
This Criminal Miscellaneous Case is filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.383/2023 of the Kadavanthra Police Station, Ernakulam. The above case is registered alleging offences punishable under sections 417 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The contention of the petitioner is that, event if the entire allegations in the FIR is accepted in toto, no offence is made out. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, a false case is foisted against the petitioner by the 2nd respondent. It is also submitted that the above case is used to defame the petitioner also.
3. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent, I am of the considered opinion that, this Court need not stall the investigation which is going on. But, there is some force in the argument of the petitioner that since the investigation is delayed, there is prejudice to the petitioner. I am of the opinion that the Investigating Officer should complete the investigation within two months.
Therefore, this Crl.M.C is disposed of directing the Investigating Officer in Crime No.383/2023 of Kadavanthra Police Station, Ernakulam to complete the investigation as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Sd/-
P. V. KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE Sbna/
APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 4217/2023 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.
383/2023 OF KADAVANTHRA POLICE STATION Annexure A2 A TRUE COPY OF BANK STATEMENT OF ICICI BANK DATED 19.04.2023 Annexure A3 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED
27.03.2023 Annexure A4 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED
02.04.2023 Annexure A5 TRUE COPY OF WHATSAPP MESSAGE DATED
18.04.2023 RECEIVED BY THE SON OF THE PETITIONER Annexure A6 TRUE COPY OF WEB NEWS PUBLISHED IN WWW.MYKOCHINEWS.COMDATED 16.04.2023 Annexure A7 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED
24.04.2023 Annexure A8 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY SENT BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 29.04.2023 Annexure A9 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED
11.05.2023 RESPONDENT ANNEXURES Annexure R2(a) True copy of the Whats App Chat between the petitioner and respondent No.2 dated
2.9.2022 Annexure R2(b) True copy of the Whats App chat between the petitioner and respondent No.2 dated
4.9.2022 Annexure R2(c) True copy of the Whats App chat between the petitioner and respondent No.2 dated
4.9.2022 Annexure R2(c1) True copy of the Whats App chat between the petitioner and respondent No.2 dated
26.9.2022 Annexure R2(d) True copy of the Whats App chat between the petitioner and respondent No.2 dated
30.10.2022 Annexure R2(d1) True copy of the Whats App chat between the petitioner and respondent No.2 dated
18.11.2022 Annexure R2(d2) True copy of the Whats App chat between the petitioner and respondent No.2 dated
8.12.2022 Annexure R2(e) True copy of the Whats App chat between the petitioner and respondent No.2 dated
9.11.2022 Annexure R2(f) True copy of the Whats App chat between the petitioner and respondent No.2 dated
9.11.2022 Annexure R2(g) True copy of the Whats App chat between the petitioner and respondent No.2 dated
30.10.2022 Annexure R2(h) True copy of the Whats App chat between the petitioner and respondent No.2 dated
9.11.2022 Annexure R2(i): True copy of the Whats App chat between the petitioner and respondent No.2 dated
4.1.2023 Annexure R2(j) True copy of the Whats App chat between the petitioner and respondent No.2 dated
3.2.2023 Annexure R2(k): True copy of the Whats App chat between the petitioner and respondent No.2 dated
26.2.2023 Annexure R2(l): True copy of the email sent by the respondent No.2 to the petitioner dated
28.2.2023 Annexure R2(m) True copy of the Whats App chat between the petitioner and respondent No.2 dated
1.3.2023
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.