SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 965

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Sathish Ninan, J
K.J.MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA & OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.J.RAMKUMAR, SRI.K.B.SONY

JUDGMENT

Challenging the dismissal of a suit for money, the plaintiff is in appeal.

2. On 12/09/1997, the plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant in relation to the work of improvements to Chalakudy-Anamala road. The work was completed within the time stipulated and to the satisfaction of the defendant. However, the bills were not paid. Thereupon, the plaintiff approached this Court in O.P.No.28609/2000.

3. As per judgment dated 27/02/2002, the Original Petition was disposed of directing payment of the bill amounts on or before 30/06/2002 with a default clause to pay interest at the rate of 12% per annum, on failure to pay within that date. The claim of the plaintiff – petitioner for interest prior to 30/06/2002 was left open to be adjudicated in Civil Court. It is thereupon that the suit is filed.

4. The trial court relied on clauses 68 & 69 of the Preliminary Specifications to Madras Detailed Standard Specifications (M.D.S.S) and held that the plaintiff is not entitled for interest for the period.

Accordingly, the suit was dismissed.

5. Heard the learned counsel on either sides.

6. The contract provides that the Preliminary Specifications to M.D.S.S will form part of the c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top