HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Devan Ramachandran, J
SIYAVUDEENKABEERKUTTY – Appellant
Versus
NIKHIL MERCANTILE PVT. LTD – Respondent
OP(ICA) 2 2023
Arbitration - Interim Measures - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 9, Section 17 - The court emphasized the necessity of seeking interim protection from the arbitrator when arbitration has commenced under SIAC rules, while allowing continuity of existing interim orders.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought interim protection related to arbitration proceedings under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, citing the perishable nature of the subject matter at stake.
Issues: Whether the court should grant interim protection under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act when arbitration is already underway and interim measures can be sought from the arbitrator?
Ratio Decidendi: The court highlighted that when arbitration has commenced, it is prudent for parties to exercise their rights within the arbitration framework instead of seeking intervention from the court.
Final Decision: The petitions are ordered, with existing interim orders continuing for four months.
JUDGMENT
Effectively, the petitioners have approached this Court seeking protection of the subject matter of the Arbitration between the parties, under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 .
2. However, it is unequivocally conceded by learned counsel for the parties today, that the Arbitration proceedings have commenced under the Rules of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC).
3. The fact reveals that when these original petitions were considered by this Court, the respondents offered to furnish Bank Guarantee for the value of the subject matter, so as to enable them to sell the same, citing it to be perishable. The Bank Guarantees in question are also thus alive.
4. Obviously, therefore, it will not be prudent for this Court to now entertain the afore original petitions because, the petitioner can certainly move the learned Arbitrator under the Rules applicable for necessary interim protection and interim orders. Concededly, such liberties are embedded to the applicable Rules, as we have Section 17 under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 . In fact, both sides affirm the afore and thus pleaded that they be reserved their rights to move the learned Arbitrator appropriately.
5. In the afore circumstances, but in order to enable the petitioners to move the learned Arbitrator without the threat of imminent loss of the subject matter, I direct that the interim orders granted by this Court will continue to be in force for a period of four months from today and that respondents will keep the Bank Guarantees alive for the said period.
6. Needless to say, the rights of the parties to move the learned Arbitrator appropriately are left open fully.
These original petitions are thus ordered.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE
20.02.2023 ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE FIRST RESPONDENT Exhibit-P4 TRUE COPY OF THE EMAIL DATED 17.05.2023 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT Exhibit-P5 TRUE COPY OF THE BILL OF LADING OF M/S.
MEARSK LINE BEARING NO.MAEU 225870340 DATED 28.03.2023 Exhibit-P6 TRUE COPY OF THE BILL OF LADING OF M/S.
MEARSK LINE BEARING NO.MAEU 226287074 DATED 28.03.2023 PETITIONER ON WHAATSAPP ON 2.3.2020 Exhibit-P7 TRUE COPY OF THE EMAIL DATED 17.05.2023 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT Exhibit-P8 TRUE COPY OF THE EMAIL DATED 26.05.2023 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT Exhibit-P9 TRUE COPY OF THE EMAIL DATED 01.06.2023 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER Exhibit-P10 TRUE COPY OF THE EMAIL DATED 01.06.2023 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER IN REPLY TO EXHIBIT P9 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT RESPONDENT EXHIBITS Exhibit R1(a) TRUE COPY OF THE BOARD RESOLUTION OF THE
1ST RESPONDENT DATED 26.05.2023 Exhibit R1(b) TRUE COPY OF THE EMAIL COMMUNICATION CONFIRMING THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT DATED 20.02.2023 Exhibit R1(c) TRUE COPIES OF THE SALE-PURCHASE CONTRACTS DATED 20.02.2023 AND 11.02.2023 Exhibit R1(d) TRUE COPY OF THE EMAIL SENT BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 30.03.2023 Exhibit R1(e) TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY EMAIL SENT BY THE PETITIONER DATED 11.04.2023 Exhibit R1(f) TRUE COPY OF THE BILLS OF ENTRY AND OUTCHARGE BY CUSTOMS DATED 25.05.2023 Exhibit R1(g) TRUE COPY OF THE MASTER DATA OF THIS RESPONDENT DATED 31.05.2023 Exhibit R1(h) TRUE COPIES OF THE BILLS OF LADING, COMMERCIAL INVOICES ETC. DATED 28.03.2023 AND THE DRAFT HIGH SEA SALES AGREEMENT DATED 20.04.2023 Exhibit R1(i) TRUE COPY OF EMAIL COMMUNICATION EXCHANGED ON 17.05.2023 BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE 1ST RESPONDENT Exhibit R1(j) TRUE COPY OF THE EMAILS
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.