SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 10146

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P. G. Ajithkumar, J
AMAL.K.M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
J.R.PREM, NAVAZ, SUMEEN S.MUHAMMED, SWADIQ

O R D E R

This Crl.M.C. is filed to quash the proceedings in Sessions case No. 479 of 2022 of Asst.Sessions Judge, Perumbavoor invoking the powers under Sec.482 Cr.P.C. It is submitted that the matter is settled and the affidavit filed by the victims are also produced. But the Public Prosecutor submitted that the 4th petitioner is involved in one case and the 3rd petitioner is involved in two cases and he is also included in the rowdy list of Karinkunnam Police Station. A perusal of the reports submitted by the Station House Officer, Kalady would show that the offences alleged in the cases registered against the petitioners include the offence under Sec. 308 IPC . In the present case also, the offence alleged includes Sec.308 .

2. In such circumstances, I am of the considered opinion that this Crl.M.C. to quash the proceedings based on settlement need not be entertained. The petitioners can approach the trial court and file appropriate application for discharge. If such an application is filed, the court concerned will consider the same in accordance with law.

With the above observation, this Crl.M.C. is disposed of.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SKS APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 6318/2023 PETIT

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top