JUDGMENT

The above W.P.(Crl.) is filed challenging Ext.P4 order passed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court – I, Chalakudy in Crl.M.P.No.4711/2021 in C.C.No.943/2018. Petitioner is the defacto complainant. The petitioner is not satisfied with the investigation and hence she filed Ext.P3 petition under Section 173 (8) Cr.P.C. The learned Magistrate dismissed the same as per Ext.P4 order. Aggrieved by the same this Writ petition (Crl.) is filed.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. This Court perused Ext.P4 order. The learned Magistrate considered the matter in detail in the impugned order and dismissed the petition. It will be better to extract the relevant portion of Ext.P4 order:

“5. Heard the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. He submitted and argued that the investigating officer had collected all evidence and produced before the court along with final report. There is no need for conducting further investigation at the whims and fancies of the defacto complainant. I have perused the records. The investigation was conducted by the Inspector of Police, Chalakudy and he had collected and produced all documentary evi