SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 63576

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
D. Nagarjun, J
Singaraju Somasekhar – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents:

Table of Content
1. facts surrounding the complaint and counter-allegations. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. discussion on the applicability of section 354d ipc. (Para 5 , 6)
3. court's decision on the trial proceedings and allowed charges. (Para 12 , 13)

ORDER

This petition is filed for quashment of C.C.No.5168 of 2018 registered against the accused for the offence under Sections 354D , 504 and 506 IPC.

2. The facts in brief as per the charge sheet are as under: On 07.06.2018 at 10.00 a.m, the de-facto complainant has filed a complaint stating that her son and daughter are in Phillipins for study and work. There are some issues between one Singaraju and her son in Philliphins. The petitioner, who is the brother of that Singaraju, has threatened the de-facto complainant and her husband over phone and also abused them in filthy language. The petitioner has come to Kirana shop when her husband was in the store and has taken photographs of her husband and sent them to the de-facto complainant’s son and daughter in Philliphins and sent a message that they will kill them. The petitioner has also sent audio message to the defacto complainant while abusing the de-facto complainant’s daughter in filthy lan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top