SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 25148

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SHAJI P.CHALY, J
Darlene Carmelita D’Cruz – Appellant
Versus
Kerala State Housing Board – Respondent
W.P.(C). No.18844 of 2005



Advocates:
For the Petitioners: S. Santhosh Kumar
For Respondents:Dr. K.P. Kylasanatha Pillay (Sr. Advocate), P.C. Iype, Sergi Joseph Thomas, Arun B. Varghese, Sreedevi Kylasanath, T.P. Deyananthan, Jessel Vinohar Rodricks, Sergi Joseph Thomas, P. Gopalakrishnan Nair, A. Jayasankar & George Boban

Owners of residential properties must comply with restrictive covenants against commercial use as outlined in sale deeds and applicable regulations.

Headnote:(A) State Housing Board Act 1971 (Kerala) - Sections 53 & 55 - State Housing Board (Formation of Allottees Associations) Regulations 2000 (Kerala), Reg. 6 - Apartment Ownership Act 1983 (Kerala), Ss. 12 & 3(j) - The court investigates illegal commercial use of residential apartments, finding it detrimental to residents' interests, emphasizing obligations under sale deeds and regulations. (Para. 19)

(B) The authorities must enforce residential use as per agreed terms, with the Board retaining control until an association is constituted. The necessity of maintaining residential integrity in housing schemes is paramount. (Paras 20-23)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners, owners of residential flats, seek removal of commercial activities occurring in their complex, asserting it violates the specific terms of their sale deeds.

Findings of Court:
The Housing Board must eliminate any unauthorized commercial usage, ensuring apartments serve their intended purpose.

Issues: The court must address whether the Board can enforce restrictions post-sale and uphold the terms of residential agreements.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that owners are bound by restrictive clauses in sale deeds regarding the use of properties.

Result: Writ Petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. initiation of a writ for preventing unauthorized commercial use. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. resident's entitlement based on sale deed terms. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. housing board's continued authority post-sale. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. emphasis on preserving residential integrity. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
5. court ruling to remove commercial activities within three months. (Para 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT

This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioners seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 to take action in order to prevent use of apartments in Chinnakkada Housing Accommodation Scheme, Site II of the Housing Board at Kollam for commercial purposes and to ensure that apartments are used purely for residential purposes and other related relieves.

2. Necessary facts required for the disposal of the Writ Petition are as follows:

3. Petitioners are owners of flats purchased from the 1st respondent, in its Housing Accommodation Scheme, Site II at Chinnakkada in Kollam. They are aggrieved by the inaction of the Board in taking action against the use of flats in the housing scheme for purposes not provided under this scheme. The Kerala State Housing Board is a statutory authority created under the Kerala State Housing Board Act, 1971, hereinafter called the Act, for the execution of housing and improvement schemes in Kerala. In accordance with the powers conferred on the Board under the said statute, it formulated a scheme under S.42 of the Act, 1971 viz; Chinnakkada Housing Accommodation Scheme, Site - II for the construction of 24 EF-9 type flats. The scheme was sanctioned by the Government as per G.O.(MS) No.38/92/Housing dated 27.7.1992 and notified under S.55 of the Act, evident from Ext.P1. Shop rooms and commercial buildings with office space mentioned in the notification are situated away from the residential buildings.

4. Board has constructed 4 blocks of multi-storied building. There are 6 apartments in each block. Petitioners purchased flats by executing a sale deed with the 3rd respondent. First petitioner purchased flat No.EF-9/308 as per registered sale deed No.1147/1/2004 dated 29.3.2004 and 2nd petitioner purchased flat No.EF-9/207 as per registered sale deed No.651/04 dated 27.2.2004, of S.R.O., Kollam.

5. It is the contention of the petitioners that, they are residing in the said flats along with their families. The flats in the housing scheme are exclusively meant for residential purposes. Sale deeds provide that the flats shall not be used for any purpose other than residential purpose. Likewise Clause 19 of the Hire Purchase Agreement in respect of persons who opt for hire purchase also provides that the parties shall not use the building and premises thereto directly or indirectly for any purpose other than the purpose of his own residence.

6. It is contended that Regulation 6(1) of Kerala State Housing Board (Formation of Allottees Associations) Regulations, 2000, hereinafter called Regulations, also provides that all apartments in the housing scheme shall be used purely for residential purposes. In spite of the specific stipulation in the sale deed, hire purchase agreement and in the regulations, many of the allottees of flats have let out their flats for using it for commercial purposes to various persons. It is the specific contention of the petitioners that, there are godowns, offices, sales outlet etc. etc., functioning in the housing complex, that 14 flats are now being used for commercial purposes. The details of the flats used for commercial purposes are as follows:

FlatAllotteeLesseePurpose for which the flat isput to use.
104S. ThulasidharanM/s. Bright Auto Spares Pvt. Ltd.Godown-cum-office
105Ike ThomasANERTOffice-cum-godown
106P.N. Narayana PillaiSpeed & Safe Courier ServiceOffice
107ViswambaranM/s. Rajkumar &Company (Contractors &Engineers)Office
108M. Pulomaja DeviM/s. Rajkumar & Company (Contractors)Office
201N. AnirudhanM/s. Girish & Associates (Architects)Office
203Kunjoojamma BabyCivil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top