Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
R.V. Raveendran, G.P. Mathur, JJ
Pulicherla Nagaraju – Appellant
Versus
State of A.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's groundwork and initial incidents detailed. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. sequential quarrels leading to violent acts clarified. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. analysis of witness credibility and evidence. (Para 6) |
| 4. trial court's acquittal findings discussed. (Para 7) |
| 5. court's reaffirmation of appeal dismissal against earlier rulings. (Para 8) |
| 6. appellant's assertions against high court's decision explored. (Para 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 7. court's assessment of intent and judicial principles. (Para 11 , 14 , 19) |
R.V. Raveendran, J.
This appeal by special leave is against the judgment dated 28.8.2003 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Criminal Appeal No.1211 of 2001 reversing the judgment of acquittal dated 7.2.2000 passed by the First Addl. Sessions Judge, Chittoor in S.C. No.361 of 1999.
2. The prosecution case, in brief, is as under :
2.1) P. Narasimha Reddy (PW-2) and P. Govinda Reddy (Accused No.1) are brothers. P. Dilli Babu Reddy (PW-1) and Purushotham Reddy (deceased) are the sons of Narasimha Reddy. Ranamma (Accused No.2) is the wife of Govinda Reddy. Nagaraja Reddy (Accused No.3), Balakrishna Reddy @ 'Balu' and Chandrababu Reddy @ 'Babu' are the sons of Govinda Reddy and Ranamma. (B
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
