Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
R.V. Raveendran, G.P. Mathur, JJ
Pulicherla Nagaraju – Appellant
Versus
State of A.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's groundwork and initial incidents detailed. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. sequential quarrels leading to violent acts clarified. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. analysis of witness credibility and evidence. (Para 6) |
| 4. trial court's acquittal findings discussed. (Para 7) |
| 5. court's reaffirmation of appeal dismissal against earlier rulings. (Para 8) |
| 6. appellant's assertions against high court's decision explored. (Para 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 7. court's assessment of intent and judicial principles. (Para 11 , 14 , 19) |
R.V. Raveendran, J.
2. The prosecution case, in brief, is as under :
2.2) Narasimha Reddy, after his marriage, having differences with his parents had shifted to his father-in-law's place and then to Madras. Ultimately, he came back to his native village. In the meanwhile, Govinda Reddy and two other brothers namely Krishna Reddy and Venkateswarulu Reddy had continued to live with their father Bakki Reddy. Bakki Reddy and Venkateswarulu Reddy had died and Krishna Reddy was residing in a different town. Govinda Reddy was in possession and enjoyment of the family properties. There were disputes between the families of Narasimha Reddy and Govinda Reddy in regard to property.
2.4) On 25.4
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
