SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Online)(KER) 30209

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
M.N.KRISHNAN, J
IBRAHIMKUTTY – Appellant
Versus
KHADEEJA – Respondent


Advocates:
Sri.K.P.MUJEEB, Sri.T.KRISHNAN UNNI, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR R1,2

O R D E R

This revision is preferred against the order of Family Court, Manjeri in M.C No. 372 /2003. Minor child moved this application for enhancement of maintenance. and the Family Court had granted some enhancement of maintenance at the rate of Rs.650/- from the date of petition and at the rate of Rs.850/- from the date of order. It is against that decision the husband has come up in revision.

perused the records. It is an application under Section

127 of the Cr.P.C. The child was awarded a maintenance of Rs.400/- as per order dated 22.1.2001. The prayer for enhanced maintenance is made within a short period of two years and the Tribunal has enhanced the same. According to the wife, the husband is working abroad and is getting a total income of more than Rs.25,000/-. On the other hand, the husband would contend that he has come back from abroad and he is in search of a job in the locality. It is also seen that the husband has deposed before the court that he is selling fish from which he earns about Rs.250/-, per day. It is true that the gap for filing an enhancement application is very narrow. Only the husband has come back from abroad and he is trying to do some other work in t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top