ORDER

Petitioner claims to be a committee formed by a group of persons to whom financial liabilities were outstanding to be discharged by one Kunhahammed, who is now no more. Petitioner styling itself to be in such capacity had moved an application for its impleadment as an additional defendant under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure in a suit for recovery of money, O.S No.79/2008, filed by the 1st respondent against the legal heirs of Kunhahammed, his widow and children. The liabilities to the plaintiff and similarly placed creditors of Kunhahammed had been incurred by him towards operation of his business establishments and now all those assets have been taken over by the petitioner committee was their case seeking impleadment as an additional defendant in the suit. That application was opposed by the 1st respondent/plaintiff. The learned Sub Judge found no merit in the application moved for by the revision petitioner seeking its impleadment as an additional defendant in the suit, and it was turned down. Propriety, legality and correctness of that order is sought to be assailed invoking the revisional jurisdiction vested with this court.

C.R.P No.603/2010 2

2. I he