Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
DR.RAMLA KUZHIKKATTIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. lack of evidence in prosecution. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court's final decision on closure. (Para 2 , 7) |
| 3. procedural lapses noted by the court. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER
Dated this the 10th day of October, 2025 The 1st accused in Crime No.03/2025 of the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau, Malappuram, has filed this Crl.M.C. under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, seeking the following relief:
“To quash all further proceeding pending against the petitioner/1st accused in Crime No.03/2024 of the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau, Malappuram.”
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor, in detail.
3. As borne out from the report filed by the Inspector of Police, who is the Investigating Officer in this crime, the crux of the prosecution allegations, as stated in paragraph No.2, is as under:
“2. It is submitted that based on the source information regarding the allegations of misappreciation at Wandur Par & Palliative Centre (Chethanan) Govt. Homeo Health Centre Hospital during the year 2021-2022, a surprise check was conducted by Vigilance & Anti Corruption Bureau, Malappuram Unit on 08.12.2022. Upon the findi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
