Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 45321

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Kauser Edappagath, J
RESMI PILLAI, PROPRIETRIX, SREE PARAMESWARA FUELS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.REV.PET NO. 2882 OF 2007

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN, SRI.M.R.SASITH
For the Respondents: SRI.GEORGE THOMAS (MEVADA)(SR.), SHRI.S.K.PREMRAJ, SRI.AMAL GEORGE, SHRI.MANU GEORGE KURUVILLA, SHRI.PARAMESWARAN S.D., SRI.E.C.BINEESH-SR.PP

The absence of obstruction in a case can lead to the closure of a criminal revision petition.

Headnote:This judgment relates to a revision petition challenging an order from the Sub Divisional Magistrate Court, Kollam in MC No.10/2007, with no representation for the petitioner. Notably, the counsel for the respondents argued the dispute no longer exists due to the absence of obstruction. The court concluded that the criminal revision petition is closed.

ORDER

This revision petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate Court, Kollam in MC No.10/2007.

There is no representation for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the dispute no more survives inasmuch as there is no obstruction at present.

In these circumstances, the criminal revision petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document