SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 45590

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
M.P. MADHUSOODANAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.A NO. 467 OF 2016 | C.C.No.6/2016



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.P.J.MATHEW, SHRI.EBIN MATHEW
For the Respondents: SRI.SREELAL N WARRIER

The abatement of criminal appeals occurs upon the death of the appellant if legal heirs do not pursue the case, allowing for collection of fines against the deceased's property.

Headnote:The appellant challenged his conviction under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for a case adjudicated on 29.04.2016. After the appellant's death, his legal heirs chose not to proceed with the appeal, leading to its abatement while maintaining the imposed fine. The court permitted the prosecution to recover the fine from any property left by the deceased appellant. The appeal was dismissed with further directives to the Registry on processing the death certificate.

Table of Content
1. challenging conviction under section 374(2) (Para 1)
2. legal heirs not pursuing the appeal post-death of appellant (Para 2 , 3)
3. final judgment by the court to dismiss the appeal (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 16th day of October, 2025 This appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 , challenging the judgment of conviction dated 29.04.2016 in C.C.No.6/2016 on the files of the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Thalassery. The appellant herein is the accused in the above case.

2. In this matter, the learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the appellant is no more. A copy of the Death Certificate showing the death of the appellant, issued by the Registrar of Births and Deaths, Kalpetta Muncipality, has been produced by the learned counsel for the appellant. He also submitted that the legal heirs of the appellant not intended to proceed with this appeal.

3. Since the legal heirs of the appellant did not turn up to prosecute the matter, the appeal could not be proceeded with. Therefore, the conviction, as against the appellant, stands abated and the sentence of fine shall remain.

4. The appeal is accordingly dismissed, with liberty to the prosecution to realise the fine by proceeding against the property left by the appellant, if any. If the legal heirs of the appellant are aggrieved in the matter of realisation of fine, they are at liberty to approach this Court to address their grievances, in accordance with law.

Registry is directed to append the copy of the Death Certificate as part of the records and to forward a copy of this judgment to the Special Court, for information and compliance.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top