SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
SIYAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri.C.R.Sanish, Sri.Karthik S. Acharya, Smt.Anjana K.P
For the Respondents: Sri.T.U.Sujith Kumar

ORDER

Dated this the 23rd day of October, 2025

The petitioners are the accused 1 to 5 in C.C.No.30/2023 on the file of the Court of the Judicial – First-Class Magistrate I, Alappuzha, which has been registered against the accused persons for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Sections 34 1 , 323, 324, 294(b), 506(2) r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code .

2. The crux of the prosecution's case is that, on 24.09.2022, the petitioners had attacked the de facto complainant(2nd respondent) in the parking area near the court premises of the District Court, Alappuzha, when they were returning after the mediation discussion in MC No.193/2022. The petitioners 1 and 2 had obstructed the de facto complainant, and the 2nd petitioner had slapped him on his face, the 3rd petitioner hit him on his head with a helmet and the 4th petitioner attacked the de facto complainant on the rear side of his body. The petitioners 1 and 5 twisted his hand and caused hurt to him. Thus, the accused have committed the above offence.

3. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners the learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent.

4. The learned Counsel f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top