Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
SIYAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused entities charges under ipc. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on complaint validity and intentions. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. inherent powers and conditions for quashing. (Para 6 , 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. merits of allegations cannot be evaluated in quashing. (Para 8) |
| 5. decision to dismiss crl.m.c. with rights reserved. (Para 11) |
ORDER
Dated this the 23rd day of October, 2025
The petitioners are the accused 1 to 5 in C.C.No.30/2023 on the file of the Court of the Judicial – First-Class Magistrate I, Alappuzha, which has been registered against the accused persons for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Sections 34 1 , 323, 324, 294(b), 506(2) r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The crux of the prosecution's case is that, on 24.09.2022, the petitioners had attacked the de facto complainant(2nd respondent) in the parking area near the court premises of the District Court, Alappuzha, when they were returning after the mediation discussion in MC No.193/2022. The petitioners 1 and 2 had obstructed the de facto complainant, and the 2nd petitioner had slapped him on his face, the 3rd petitioner hit him on his head with a helmet and the 4th petitioner attacked the de fac
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
