SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 46039

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
SANIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.ANOOP
For the Respondents: SRI.A.CHANDRA BABU

ORDER

The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.429/2022 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Attingal, which arises out of the Crime No.340/2022 registered by the Attingal Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 341, 323, 324 and 283 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court under Section482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash Annexure A-1 Final Report and all further proceedings in C.C.No.429/2022. It is averred in the criminal miscellaneous case that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent who has affirmed Annexure A-2 affidavit, vouching for the settlement.

3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 2nd respondent.

4. The learned counsel on either side submit that, with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the parties have resolved their differences amicably. The 2nd respondent is no longer desirous of pursuing the prosecution and has no objection in the proceedings being quashed.

5. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top