Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
ANILKUMAR @ THAMBI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioner is accused under ipc section 394. (Para 2) |
| 2. the court heard arguments from both sides. (Para 3) |
| 3. the court discussed the implications of the petitioner's criminal history. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. the crl.m.c. is dismissed. (Para 6) |
ORDER
The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1367/2017 registered by the Ernakulam Town South Police Station for allegedly committing offence punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The petitioner has approached this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash Annexures A-1 FIR and all further proceedings in Crime No.1367/2017. It is averred in the criminal miscellaneous case that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent. The 3rd respondent is the victim, who has affirmed Annexures A-2 affidavit, vouching for the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 3rd respondent.
4. The Hon’ble Supreme Court, in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] , State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and Other
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
