IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
INDULEKHA – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed seeking to quash Exts.P10 to P13, P16 and P17.
2. Brief facts necessary for the disposal of the case are as follows: Petitioner’s father was in possession and enjoyment of 26.405 cents of land comprised in survey Nos.210, 211 and 208 of Thycaud Village, Thiruvananthapuram District obtained as per Ext.P1 settlement deed. As per the above settlement deed, a 10 feet private road is provided for ingress and egress to the scheduled properties, from the drainage road to the scheduled properties. It is mentioned in Ext.P1 settlement deed that the extent of the private road is included in the A schedule allotted to the father of the petitioner for fiscal purpose and only two persons are allowed to use the said private road and the said road ends in the property of the father of the petitioner. Thereafter the respective parties have effected mutation of the properties and they are enjoying the same. Petitioner’s father had three children, including the petitioner, Chithralekha and Jayachandran. Subsequently in 1993, as per Ext.P2 settlement deed an extent of 6.305 cents of land comprised in survey No.210/1 of Thycaud Village was given to his son Jayac
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.