Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
RUKHIYA JAMAL, SIDDIQUE, SHALIYA, ABDUL MANAF, VAHAB, ALI, SHAMSUDHEEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. criminal accusations were registered leading to a petition for quashing. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners and victim reached an amicable resolution. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations support the exercise of inherent powers due to the nature of the offences. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
ORDER
The petitioners are the accused Nos. 1 to 7 in Crime No. 1803/2017 registered by the Kalamassery Police Station, Ernakulam for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 294(b) and 506 (1) r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The case is now pending as C.C. No. 1375/2017 before the Judicial First-Class Magistrate Court, Kalamassery.
2. The petitioners have approached this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash Annexure A1 FIR, Annexure A2 Final report and all further proceedings in the above crime. It is averred in the criminal miscellaneous case that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent (victim), who have affirmed Annexure A3 affidavit, vouching for the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Pr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
