IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
MOHAMMED NISHAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
ORDER
The petitioners are the accused Nos. 2 and 3 in Crime No. 380/2025 registered by the Vadakkencherry Police Station, Palakkad for the offence punishable under Section 318 (4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita .
2. The petitioners have approached this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash Annexure A FIR and all further proceedings in the above crime. It is averred in the criminal miscellaneous case that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the 2nd respondent (victim), who have affirmed Annexure C affidavit, vouching for the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 2nd respondent.
4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the parties have resolved their differences amicably. The 2nd respondent is no longer desirous of pursuing the prosecution and has no objection in the proceedings being quashed.
5. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that the Investigating Officer has reported that the p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.