Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
ANIL KUMAR.K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments regarding the nature of the complaint. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court's reliance on precedent for quashing complaints. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. final assessment on the sufficiency of allegations. (Para 10 , 11) |
ORDER
Dated this the 21st day of October, 2025
The petitioners are the accused 1 to 7 in C.C.No.726/2021 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Taliparamba (‘Trial Court, in short), which arises out of Crime No.907/2019, registered by the Taliparamba Police Station, Kannur, for the offences punishable under Sections 120B , 406, 418, 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The prosecution's case, in essence, is that on 28.11.2011, the accused persons had hatched a conspiracy and made the defacto complainant believe that if he invested in the shares of a company named ‘Recad Builders and Developers Ltd.’, he would be given high profits and an employment in the company. Accordingly, the defacto complainant paid Rs.3/- lakh to the accused persons 1 and 2, who divided the money with the other accused persons.
Thus the accused have committed the above offences.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
