Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
SHINOJ ANTONY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks quashing of fir based on amicable settlement. (Para 2) |
| 2. parties reached a settlement, no objection from prosecution. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's assessment leads to favorable ruling based on facts. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER
Dated this the 16th day of October, 2025
The petitioner is the 2nd accused in Crime No. 503/2025 registered by the Ernakulam Town South Police Station, Ernakulam for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The petitioner has approached this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , to quash Annexure A1 FIR and all further proceedings in the above crime. It is averred in the criminal miscellaneous case that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent (victim), who have affirmed Annexure A2 affidavit, vouching for the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 3rd respondent.
4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
