Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. G. Ajithkumar, J
CIVICHAN ANTONY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition for mandamus to ensure investigation. (Para 1) |
| 2. court notes the final report filed by authorities. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"(i) To issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ or order or direction against Respondents 1 to 3 to see that the investigation against the 4th Respondent, Pursuant to Ext.P1, be done properly and to file the Final Report/ Charge Sheet within a reasonable time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.
(ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ or order or direction against Respondents 1 and 3 to see that the investigation, pursuant to Ext.P1, be entrusted to or supervised by a superior officer of the 2nd Respondent.
(iii) To issue such other approach writ order or direction in favour of the petitioner as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts, circumstances and the law involved in the case, including cost in favour of the petitioner.”
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition (C) came up for consideration, the Public Prosecutor submitted that the case is registered and, after investigation, a final report is filed. If that is the case, no further direction is ne
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
