Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
RAJU.C.ISSAC – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused seeks quash of fir due to settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel confirms amicable settlement. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court supports quashing based on non-serious nature of offences. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
The petitioner is the accused in S.T. No. 528/2022 on the file of the Grama Nyayalaya, Vadavucode, which arises out of Crime No. 176/2022 registered by the Kunnathunadu Police Station, as against the petitioner for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The petitioner has approached this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash Annexure A1 FIR, Annexure A2 Final Report and all further proceedings in the above crime. It is averred in the criminal miscellaneous case that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the second respondent, which is evidenced by the affidavit dated
30.06.2025 executed by the second respondent.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the second respondent .
4. The learned counsel o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
