Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
SOBHA ANNIE BINU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. incident of alleged assault (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the merits of the prosecution's case (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. principles concerning quashing of proceedings (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. established principles on inherent powers (Para 7) |
| 5. final ruling on the crl.m.c. (Para 11) |
O R D E R
The petitioner is the sole accused in C.C.No.994 of
2019 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class-II, Pathanamthitta, which arises out of Crime No.950 of 2018 registered by the Koipuram Police Station, Pathanamthitta, as against the accused for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Sections 294 (b) and 324 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The prosecution case, in essence, is that, on
17.09.2018 at around 9.00 hours, the petitioner had abused the defacto complainant (2nd respondent) in vulgar language and beat him with a broom stick and caused hurt to him because the 2nd respondent had thrown a bulb at petitioner's house.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that, even if the allegations in Annexure B final report are taken on its face value, the same will not
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
