Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
PRASANTH KUMAR G – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. transfer challenged based on alleged punitive nature and policy violation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. response argues transfer was legitimate and required for administrative needs. (Para 3) |
| 3. tribunal's rationale emphasizes the authority's discretion in transfer matters. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. judicial review constraints on transfer legality are clarified, emphasizing adherence to authority. (Para 6) |
| 5. district court concludes the case lacks merits and dismisses the petition. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
The present Original Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 21.10.2025 passed in Original Application No.180/000608/2024, whereby the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench, has dismissed the Original Application.
2. The petitioner is the applicant in the Original Application, and the respondents herein are the respondents in the Original Application. The petitioner, who is working as Senior Purchase and Stores Officer at the Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre (VSSC), Thiruvananthapuram, a unit of the ISRO under the Department of Space, Government of India, had challenged the transfer order dated 19.11.2024, whereby he w
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
