Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
KAVITHA N. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of criminal offense against the petitioner. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the innocence of the petitioner vs. the prosecution's claims. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. discussion on the application of inherent powers under relevant statutes. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. final ruling on the application for quashing the case. (Para 9) |
O R D E R Dated this the 28th day of October, 2025 The petitioner is the 2nd accused in C.C.No.266/2021 on the file of the Court of the Judicial –
First-Class Magistrate III, Kozhikode, which arises out of Crime No.980/2020 registered by the Kasaba Police Station, Kozhikode as against the accused persons for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The crux of the prosecution case, is that, the de facto complainant had approached the 1st accused, requesting him to arrange a clerical job in Zamorian School Management, Thali and received Rs.20,50,000/- from the de facto complainant(2nd respondent). But, he has failed to secure the employment and refused to return the money. Thus, the accused have committed the above offences.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the lear
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
