Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
M. KUNJAHMMADH MASTER – Appellant
Versus
ASEES P.M – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the nature of the accused and the filing of the criminal case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the respondents affirm amicable resolution of disputes. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's authority to quash based on non-heinous nature of offences. (Para 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
The petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 19 in C.C.No.172 of 2021 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Payyoli, which has arisen from Crime No.491 of 2020 registered by the Meppayur Police Station, Kozhikode, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 452, 506, 427, 323 and 324 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the respondents 1 to 4, who have executed Annexures 3 to 6 affidavits, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
