Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
MUHAMMED SINAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners sought to quash fir due to amicable settlement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. the court noted the position that further prosecution is unnecessary. (Para 6) |
| 3. supreme court precedents justify quashing minor offenses when settled. (Para 7) |
| 4. court concluded to quash proceedings based on multiple factors. (Para 8) |
C.S.DIAS, J.
---------------------------------------
CRL.MC No. 9031 OF 2025 -----------------------------------------
Dated this the 31st day of October, 2025 ORDER The petitioners are accused 1 to 5 in Crime No.593/2025 registered by the Valayam Police Station, Kozhikode for the offences punishable under Sections 126 (2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 110 and 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita .
2. The petitioners have approached this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in Crime No.593/2025. It is averred in the criminal miscellaneous case that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the respondents 3 and 4, who have affirmed Annexures II and III affidavits, vouching for the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Couns
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
