Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
HARIKRISHNAN C.V, NANDAGOPAL S, SREEJA C.R – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA, AVISHEK GHOSH ROY, AVINASH SAMUEL, ARDRIK SOLOMEN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused parties seek quashing of proceedings based on settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel confirm resolution of disputes; no prosecution desired. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court discusses inherent powers and previous judgments on settlements. (Para 6) |
| 4. court concludes settlement warrants quashing of proceedings. (Para 7) |
ORDER
The petitioners are accused Nos. 1 to 3 in C.C.No.840/2024 on the file of the Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Economic Offences), Ernakulam, which has arisen from Crime No.685/2024 registered by the Ernakulam Town South Police Station, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 115 (2), 118(1), and 126(2)
r/w Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 .
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the
2nd respondent, the natural guardian of respondents 3 and 4, and the respondents 2 to 4 have executed Annexures A6 to A8 affidav
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
