Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
RAHUL B PRAMOD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case filings and accused identification. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discussion on amicable settlements and lack of prosecution interests. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's application of inherent jurisdiction principles. (Para 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
The petitioners are the accused in Crime No.722 of 2025 registered by the Ernakulam Town South Police Station, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 296 , 351 and 110 read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023. 2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the 2nd respondent, who has executed Annexure A2 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 2nd respondent.
4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the intervention of relatives and well- wishers, the parties have resolved
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
