Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
ABHIJIT J. RAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused petitioners seek to quash proceedings after settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel confirm resolution of disputes, state's non-objection. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court affirms conditions for quashing based on settlement. (Para 6) |
| 4. continuing prosecution serves no purpose due to settlement. (Para 7) |
ORDER
The petitioners are accused Nos. 1 to 4 in C.C.No1328/2014 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court -II, Kollam, which has arisen from Crime No.1075/2014 registered by the Kollam East Police Station, as against the accused persons for alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 323 and 324 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the
2nd respondent, who has executed Annexure 2 a affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Co
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
